Newspaper November 8 hearing over ninety Cao uncle recently annoyed the old couple,air jordan femme, had their own demolition of more than 12 million models, is the daughter of ruthless occupation. In desperation, the daughter Cao uncle an old married couple to court. Recently, Lee Chang made a decision, to repay her parents demolition section.
It is understood that this year, a 89-year-old married couple,http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi, a 83-year-old original village Sifang Sandy Ridge Village house in one place, 2001 demolition of houses was transformed to obtain relocation compensation 120,300 yuan, the presence of Qingdao City Commercial Bank Cao old man name. 2007 years ago, the old couple have been taken care of by a small daughter Jo, relocation compensation passbook password only Jo know, during the entire relocation payments Jo extract themselves. And Jo said that she accompany his father to withdraw money every time,http://www.dojjj.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, although the word is signed, but the money was her father taken away, and no unauthorized possession of parental relocation compensation. Jo said,http://canthiet.esy.es/viewtopic.php?pid=5872#p5872, in addition to parents for rent, medical expenses and daily consumption, in 2004 his son Cao old man also lent $ 50,000, the remaining compensation funds are at their parents. According to an old married couple introduction, 50,air max,000 yuan is the daughter of Jo lend themselves relocation compensation from his son, the son of an old married couple has not yet received payment, but also the daughter of the original promissory note, it should be by his daughter returned 50,http://novel-danwa.matrix.jp/whatsnew-bbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=4309&page=,000 yuan loans.
The Court held that, according to court and obtained Qingdao City Commercial Bank withdrawal slip,air jordan site officiel, relocation compensation of 120,tiffany roma,300 yuan old married couple after all extracted from its small daughter Jo signature. Although Jo says it all an old married couple's relocation compensation to the father after the removal, but the withdrawal slip and no signature Cao old man himself, Jo did not provide the factual basis of its claim court not support it. The court held that the decision to remove the rental fee 36,http://www.kct.or.jp,140 yuan after 2001,http://harako.qee.jp, medical expenses,louboutin femme,http://www.kazenoko-club.com/bbs/kazenoko-bbs.cgi, daily fees 5218.38 yuan, daughter Jo should be returned to an old married couple relocation compensation 28,968.42 yuan, an old married couple has lent his son $ 50,000 promissory note according to,http://www.huatai123.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, it does not prove that the little daughter Jo place, it is possible to separate claims.