標題: because there was no doctor and other evidence [打印本頁] 作者: oplsdj284066 時間: 2015-10-18 04:54 標題: because there was no doctor and other evidence ■ "says shopping is rat bite Carrefour customer complaint claims" track
Ms. Lu believes that mice bitten great danger, caused her severe psychological and physical burden. It intended to last 7-8 months pregnant,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/brandcouture/vh-831.html, and the events of her family's efforts go down the drain. She sued Carrefour, ask for a public apology and compensation for moral damages solatium 2.1 million yuan,http://business.mobilepreneur.com, at the same time, Carrefour also should regularly take their annual blood tests, such as future illness, Carrefour should be held accountable.
Earlier the trial,http://2chradio.net, the defendant argued that Carrefour, the evidence submitted by Ms. Lu is insufficient to prove that she was bitten by rats in Carrefour, does not agree compensation.
Mouse hurt fact confirmed by the court
Yesterday, the court held that after the incident, Ms. Lu Carrefour to issue a "contingency records", self-written record of customer information, event time, what has happened,piumini moncler, and the results and the amount of compensation, etc.,http://repository.aichi-edu.ac.jp, in the recording unit on duty manager signature. Shop with Ms. Lu sent to the hospital, and four times to the hospital with their vaccinations, and bear the medical and transportation expenses. Thus, when Ms. Lu Carrefour shopping in the stores, was caught rat bite damage caused by the fact that should belong to know. Carrefour poor management, safety and security obligations entirely within reasonable limits, resulting in Ms. Lu suffered personal injury. Meanwhile,http://www.thomassankara.net/spip.php?article1065, the accident to Ms. Lu's body, resulting in a certain psychological influence and pressure, the court, Ms. Lu Carrefour lost income compensation of more than 1,piumini woolrich outlet,200 yuan, the spirit of solatium 5000 yuan.
But the court did not support plaintiff's claim Carrefour demands a public apology, at the same time, Ms. Lu Carrefour requires its demands for blood tests regularly take each year, because there was no doctor and other evidence,chaussures louboutin, the court did not support. The court said,brazilian hair weave, as Ms. Lu future illness, which can be prosecuted separately after the damage actually occurred.
Share: welcome to comment I want to comment
Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN009)