標題: two people living in Ms. Shen 2004 loans to buy houses. During cohabitation [打印本頁] 作者: hk6nF1d0w 時間: 2015-11-11 10:40 標題: two people living in Ms. Shen 2004 loans to buy houses. During cohabitation (Reporter Wang Qiu) man Lee said the presence of economic disputes with ex-girlfriend, Ms. Shen,http://bbs.tt919.com/read.php?tid-262522-fpage-80.html/read.php?tid-262522-fpage-80.html/post.php?fid=4?fid=4, 5 years has been living in Ms. Shen's house, even with his current wife, mother and daughter. Yesterday,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, reporters learned, after the case into the enforcement process, repeated efforts in the implementation of Mentougou court judges, the current wife of Lee Auto vacate the house.
In early 2006, Lee met a divorced after Ms. Shen, build a relationship and began living together,doudoune moncler soldes, two people living in Ms. Shen 2004 loans to buy houses. During cohabitation, of the house of Ms. Shen still repay the loan. After September 2006 after the two sides broke up, Lee is still living in the house, Ms. Shen this place, not only that, after Lee and Zhang met and married another woman,http://bbs.fxclearing.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=151315,air max 90 pas cher, the current wife, and his former wife and daughter Li 80-year-old mother also brought to live together inside of the house.
In March this year, after ex-girlfriend sued Ms. Shen, Mentougou court ruling according to law,louboutin soldes pas cher, Lee and his family,nike tn pas cher, Ms. Shen Teng quit the premises housing. Because Lee did not fulfill, in August this year,http://173.230.147.120/home.php?mod=space&uid=538159, Ms. Shen to Mentougou court for enforcement. Execution judge identified houses where Lee is now a four still live.
Lee expressed strong not Tengfang, where he said the house Although nominally Ms. Shen,nike air max 90, but because Ms. Shen owed him several hundred thousand dollars,http://cyapa.org/home.php?mod=space&uid=340824, the two sides have agreed to this house belong to him at all, but this statement is not evidence to Lee proof.