Bank to withdraw money to play catch Chen, in the car, he called the police, but to play some media rebellion phone. When back to the bank, is around 3 pm the same day. Staff responsible for the bank teller who claimed to represent, Chen did not use the money detector test, and afterwards have left the bank, counterfeit currency can not be determined whether he took from the ATM. After police arrived, said the lack of evidence,HIe2VGuSpB, after recording the testimony said that if there are problems, you can sue the court. Chen said, when withdrawals hurry, though banks and others in the security side, but they could not prove.
Mr. Chen said he often 6:00 am on the starting job, only to go home at 10, consumption can not afford time to appeal, preparation bad luck.
People's Bank of China Guangzhou Branch of a person in charge of business management department confirmed that the People's Bank will receive from time to time received complaints from members of the public from counterfeit bank. Administrative authorities will investigate if there is basis, will give a treatment advice, but now there is often a complaint of proof problem in time and space, so the evidence is very important.
South China Normal University, Professor Huang Li believes that the evidence is indeed one of the key obstacle difficult to solve such problems, and generally require a whole process of continuous surveillance video, if the middle of the interval would be difficult to set up. So it is not a legal problem, but a more comprehensive regulation within the industry to refine the requirements. Paper money on ATM difficult to implement, but can be improved by upgrading the hardware, such as in a closed space for customers to place money detector test. On the other hand, customers should raise awareness of the law,4Y7yk2UF3S, the customer has the right to require banks to examine the bill, it should be noted that the evidence preservation.
Insiders believe that the technology is highly developed, with high anti-pseudo-security costs, such cases are not prosecuted in the foreign general responsibilities of both parties, and put it into the bank within the scope of operational risk management by for-profit operators party to bear. Bank while strengthening internal controls, financially set up a "counterfeit share loss of gold" to share this loss. Can not protect its own reputation and customer interests, it is the biggest risk for banks, which is the consensus of the international financial community.
Welcome to comment I want to comment
Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN056)