|
|
(Reporter Pei Xiaolan) Chen Tongzhou Jiukeshu Wumart supermarket shop to buy health care products, was recognized approval number belongs fraudulent, Mr. Chen according to "Food Safety Law" prosecution Beijing Tongzhou Jiukeshu Wumart Group and Wumart store It requires 10 times the compensation. Reporters learned yesterday, the Second City Court of Final Appeal ruled in favor of Mr. Chen.
It is alleged that in September 2010 and in October,http://cyobi.sub.jp/cgi/link2/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&/, he has three Wumart Group Co., Ltd. in Beijing Tongzhou Jiukeshu store to buy 11 times the power box fine Wang ginseng capsules,http://www.moviequote.net/moviequote.cgi, the total price of 3245 yuan. Side effects after taking. He then log on the SFDA website approval number of the capsule query,http://www.gonganol.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=446212,hogan scarpe donna, the result is the absence of the approval. Then he reported to the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Food and Drug Administration Tongzhou,nike officiel, other answer for the capsule batch corresponding products are not Chen purchased the product, but belongs to another capsule. Chen then sued Jiukeshu Wumart Wumart Group shop and return the purchase price 3245 yuan, and 10 times the price of 32,450 yuan compensation.
After the court of first instance judgments Wumart Group and co-payments Jiukeshu store 10 times the compensation Mr. Xiang Chen. He is unable to provide due to its purchase of all of health care, so it demands a refund of the purchase price,air max tn pas cher, the court does not support. Two defendants refused to accept this, the Second Intermediate Court of Appeal.
When the second instance court, there are two main focus. First, Mr. Chen is involved in Wumart Jiukeshu capsule shop to buy? The defendant denies two,nike air max soldes,http://rehabili.godream.ne.jp/cgi-bin/bbs14/bbs14.cgi, Mr. Chen submitted to the court the sale of small ticket and stamped with the seal of the invoice Jiukeshu shop. Which marked the sale of small ticket purchased capsules name, but the invoice was marked as "food",http://www.8264.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the timing and amount of purchase displays two bills are the same.
Another focus is whether Mr. Chan claims 10 times the compensation have a legal basis. Supermarket this view, consumers are demanding 10 times the compensation on the premise that it has suffered physical damage or other losses,http://kubikino.ne.jp/cgi-def/admin/C-002/sekikawa/visit/main.pl?PAGE_NUM=1, Chen proposed adverse reactions after taking the capsules, but did not submit evidence, the court should not be supported.
Second City Court believes that the Beijing Tongzhou Branch of the Food and Drug Administration has responded to Chen's report, approval number of the capsule system of fraudulent use, so that the capsule does not comply with the "Food Safety Law" health food safety-related . Timing and amount of the purchase and sale of small ticket invoices submitted by Mr. Chen appears the same, given the two defendants failed to provide specific details of food stamped with the seal of the invoice name Jiukeshu shop under, the court found Mr. Chen from nine trees tree store bought capsules involved.
The court held that, "Food Safety Law" Article 96,basket nike, paragraph 2,http://swiftxuexi.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=53795&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=20993, the production does not meet food safety standards of food or knowingly selling does not meet food safety standards of food, consumers claim damages in addition to, you can also to producers or Sales were required to pay compensation to 10 times the price. Court of first instance there is nothing wrong,http://www.auto-tsukamoto.com/hpgen/epad/epad.cgi?del=55, the Second City Court of Final Appeal upheld the conviction.
Share: welcome to comment I want to comment
Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN056) |
|
發表於 2015-6-28 06:47:59
收藏