|
|
Evening News reporter intern Zhang Xue Qian Zhu Yun reports,scarpe louboutin
Intended for the children to do the marriage room houses, but the tenant died in there,http://bbs520.3vjia.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4364068&extra=,nike blazer,http://www.kamijoh-seikeigeka.com/cgi-bin/bbs.cgi, old beams will be signing with the landlord of Jia Tena walls (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. to court seeking compensation for economic losses of 30 million. Yesterday, the case in Jing'an District Court, the two sides over whether the breach, housing depreciation of other issues were hotly debated.
Old beams in early 2012 to a three-bedroom house rented Jia Tena company, lease year. "Room with a full set of mahogany furniture, new appliances." By the old beams, said, because it is a new house, so pay particular attention to the identity of the tenant, working conditions, etc., the old Liang Jia Tena specifically agreed in the supplementary terms of the contract in The company name is actually to clear the trio live,nike air max soldes, also got the identity card of three employees. Six months after the rental,http://bbs.zz361.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=profile&op=password, August 21, 2012, the old beams former rental house that day was the sudden death of one of the three employees dead are not contractual, but other colleagues.
"It is ready to give his son to do the marriage room ah." Liang said it could not accept the old, not only unlucky, but also directly affect the actual value of the house, "we went to the agency and housing agencies are asked to assess, at least to depreciate 25% to 30 %. "Old Liang said the agent.
During the trial,http://www.tfc-charts2.w2d.com/forum/index.cgi, both sides of the old beams and company agents in addition to display their evidence,http://www.infrc.or.jp, but also the focus of an intense debate about the three, namely: "lease contract" exists for breach of contract signed by the facts: how many houses specific derogatory, whether loss can be quantified; if the first does not hold, then in fact the lease, the existence of hidden risk transfer rent, ie the risk borne by the defendant converted the plaintiff bear, which is the first key point of controversy.
Old Liang's attorney stressed that because of the special purpose buildings and good quality, old beams very concerned about the identity of specific tenant, etc., and in the supplementary provisions expressly agreed the three employee name, identity, etc., are not random, "three people "However, it is the fourth and sudden death in people living in the house, there is a breach of facts; through intermediaries, housing assessment agency determines Housing devaluation of 25% to 30%. Old Liang's attorney said that if Jia Tena company side does not recognize,http://www.auctionzip.com/cgi-bin/auctionsearch.cgi, "We are willing to sell at normal market prices each other, and they are to deal with housing."
Jia Tena's attorney countered that the contract is three people, they also evidence can prove that before the incident, houses the actual living people never exceed three, as the additional provisions in clear and specific identity,http://nozoki.fooo.jp/top/kokuhaku/aska.cgi, but the old beams aspects tenant is a means of avoiding illegal status. Attorney, said the sudden death of three tenants and tenants are Hong Kong company's employees, whose work requires regular access to the mainland, have legal status. In addition, illness and death this is the norm, there is no affect housing sales,http://sns.koudefu.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=517327, it is recommended there should be a professional assessment of the plaintiff after a good conclusion.
The two sides will further the three issues of heated debate, the old beams attorney that the defendant improperly example,scarpe nike uomo, allegedly one concept; Jia Tena company attorney argued the plaintiffs rely on the principle of fairness Civil Code 132 is completely unreasonable, because Civil Law is a violation against infringement case rather than discussed. Yesterday,louboutin milano, the court did not in court for sentencing.
(Original title: The landlord said the unlucky tenant sudden death claims 300,000) |
|
發表於 2015-7-15 18:02:29
收藏