|
|
Video loading, please wait ... AutoPlay & nbsp; play profile - shoe factory fire killed 16 people forward and backward
Newspaper correspondent Li Jie Chen Dong newspaper reporter stationed in Taizhou
In January 14 afternoon 14:52, Wenling City, North Street Dadong Yang Wei Village, Taizhou Shoe Co. fire,nike tn pas cher, killing 16 people were killed.
After an investigation, the fire was identified as a major liability accident together, the direct cause of the shoe is located north east side of the steel shed half between electrical circuit malfunction, ignition and other combustible materials around the shoebox. legal representative and shareholders Lin Zhen Jian XingJu,moncler outlet italia, 15 people,http://mie.wire.co.jp, including the mayor of the relevant responsibilities,moncler pas cher, including Wenling be accountable.
Accident occurred more than six months later, yesterday morning, Wenling Court held a public hearing in this case. and I'm real sword two men charged with violation of the provisions on safety management in manufacturing operations, major casualties, the circumstances are especially bad, the crime of major liability accident should be held criminally responsible.
Unauthorized illegal structures steel shed
Shoe factory owner involved Serious Accident Crime
Standing on the court and I'm real sword of are brothers, brother Lin Jianfeng sturdy physique,http://share.chicagostemscouts.org/profile.php?id=6991,woolrich outlet milano, hair slightly bald, fat brother Lin Zhen sword, wearing a pair of black-rimmed glasses.
Before the accident, the two co-operation located in Wenling City,http://218.7.193.180:3097/Review.asp?NewsID=658, North Street in the village of Yang Wei Taizhou Dadong Footwear Company Limited.
After big business,http://www.tenmonkan.com, the original plant is not enough, the two brothers on the east side of irregularities in the original authorization to build a steel plant in the studio as a production site.
After seriously affect the fire safety of steel shed built, they did not take the initiative to report to the fire department by program inspection and acceptance, enterprise security management in place, the responsibility is not implemented, the fire occurred is after leaving a major security risk.
"At 14:40 on January 14, the company's shoemaking workshop faulty electrical wiring caused the fire. The fire in the workshop by means of piling up a lot of inflammable spread rapidly from the ground-floor workshop and a half north to the east side of the steel shed second and third workshop, burned area of about 1,080 square meters,http://bbs.60wd.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=12336, a total of Yang, 16 people were killed and many others injured Zhang;. plant, a lot of equipment and goods were burned, property losses amounting to 362,640 yuan. "
In court yesterday, the prosecutor believes that it is precisely because the two brothers for the sake of self-interest,http://bbs.haofang51.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=96086, ignoring safety management, fire and pave the way, and therefore can not shirk responsibility.
Prosecutor accused, while fires and forest real sword two violations on safety management in production, operations,http://www.sustainabilitystore.com, and thus a major casualty, the circumstances are especially bad, their actions have violated the "Criminal Law", should be a major liability accident criminal prosecution.
Brother voluntarily surrendered themselves in dispute
How to identify a focal point of the prosecution and the defense
In yesterday's court session, and I'm really sword voluntarily surrendered themselves two brothers became the focus of debate in both parties.
The court held that,air max 90 pas cher, after the accident, Lin Jianfeng surrendered surrender first time, and the initiative to explain the facts of the crime,http://www.k2.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, in line with "Criminal Law" the relevant provisions of Article 67, may be given a lighter or mitigated punishment. But I'm real sword of his brother, "voluntarily surrendered themselves" is not recognized by the judiciary.
Public prosecutor that I'm real sword in the fire, and did not recognize their behavior has violated the law. In fact, when I'm in the scene in real sword fighting, and it has been controlled by the police. "Now that has to be controlled, not surrendered to say exist."
He said but I'm real sword does not endorse the allegations, he explained in court, in the fire the first time, he did not leave the scene in a shoe factory.
"It was really two policemen came looking for me. I also told them that I'm going to help put out the fire, put out the fire I went to surrender." I'm really sword felt that he has revealed a willingness to surrender to the police behavior and attitudes have voluntarily surrendered themselves. "So I urge the court re-identified."
Scene controversial because the case is no court verdict.
(Original title: a pair of brothers, both stood on the dock)
(Edit: SN146) |
|
發表於 2015-10-23 02:03:20
收藏