|
|
Southern News occurred in March 4, 2009 in Zhongshan Banfu "postal savings as armed robbery," was a great hit. Last March, five suspects were all jailed for criminal proceedings means that part of the case has ended.
But civil disputes arising from the case is far from over. In the cases of robbery,http://topwen.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=587003,hogan uomo, although police later recovered 166,200 yuan, 177,300 yuan,http://www.olsmart.com/index.php?page=item&id=6013, but still failed to recover. In order to recoup their losses 177,http://www.fuxuange.com/news/html/?387344.html,300 yuan and interest, the victim of the Zhongshan branch of the Postal Savings Banfu court.
Yesterday morning, Zhongshan City People's Court Sango first court hearing of the case, but did not in court for sentencing.
Oil Company on behalf of the plaintiff to sue
Yesterday's trial were not parties to the original defendant, respondent court. Appearing on behalf of the plaintiff in Guangdong De Yuan Chen from tiger lawyer, on behalf of the defendant Banfu Zhongshan branch of the postal savings appear in Guangdong Ya Business Lawyer Chen Fenjiang.
Tellingly, the plaintiff does not sue in his own name, but on behalf of Zhongshan City where Oils & Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. Jufeng Park. Initially, the main defendant on the plaintiff raised the question whether their proper perspective.
Chen Fenjiang that, while looting the money Jufeng Park Zhongshan Foodstuffs Co., but the fact that the company did not set up the company accounts in Zhongshan Banfu postal savings branches, but opened an account in his own name. said that in this context, the Bank did not establish a contractual relationship with the plaintiff.
Bank said depositors own fault
The defense said the prosecution itself there are some mistakes. said the victim Qiumou bank to deposit large amounts of cash every day, in violation of the relevant financial institution, which also prove the existence of certain problems in their companies. In addition,http://www.youlu.so/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=100762, the defendant also said Qiu sometimes to grant duty security and red rice.
The defense said the day Qiumou carry large amounts of cash to the bank and show off their high-profile acts, is in the "induced crime." The defendant said that such behavior and ways to induce the idea of criminals crime. Therefore,hogan outlet, the victim in this regard have committed mistakes, at least more than their degree of fault accused the Postal Savings Bank.
Cases playback
Midian was robbed of more than 34 million proprietress
So far,louboutin homme, a lot of people still on board Fu cases of armed robbery in 2009 that fresh. March 4 that year, two in Henan man armed robbery of the local rice shop a female boss Qiumou spot to grab cash 343,500 yuan. Soon, the police involved in the five suspects were arrested.
Court found, in January 2009, when he was security chief Wang Banfu Post found that a female boss Qiumou town every day to carry large amounts of cash into the postal savings bank remittance business, he immediately reported the matter to a fellow library. Since then,http://yue.17tgg.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=501410, the library gathered more than a premeditated robbery.
In the same year March 4 2:00 pm, a library of men driving a motorcycle carrying associates LvMou, sneaked into the doorway near the Postal Savings Banfu opportunistic crime. At 3 pm, when Qiu Li Mouping with colleagues to reach the door and get off the postal savings bank, Lu underwent 92 armed with a pistol approached Li Mouping imitation, hands-equipped cash robbery Li Mouping hands and passbook bag. Qiumou rushed forward to the competition, Lu shot towards the ceiling intimidation disarray snatched the bag, get the library has launched a motorcycle, quickly fled the scene.
2010, by the Zhongshan Municipal Intermediate People's Court and the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court of Final Appeal,scarpe hogan, sentenced to life imprisonment in a principal library, Wang accomplice jailed for eight years (south have repeatedly reported the matter).
Tit for tat
Personal crime is committed by banks bear responsibility?
Plaintiff: Criminal Court verdict shows that for the first time to their fellow Wang Qiu talked to the bank every day to save money, the other mentioned going to rob. Then,http://www.vivalifestyle.ca/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=676313, when it ask its fellow Qiumou save time, car model,http://test2.csix.cn/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=540372, license plate number and other information, is a conspiracy to rob the process. Wang provide this information to the fellow, is involved in the robbery conspiracy.
Defendant: Wang's behavior, rather than just individual behavior duty behavior. Although Wang is indeed committed a crime, but there is no relationship with the bank, you should not be held responsible for individual acts of Wang by banks. Wang as adults should be responsible for their own personal behavior, before he had assumed the criminal, civil and should its commitment.
Whether the defendant fulfilled the obligation of confidentiality?
Plaintiff: Due to security captain Postal Savings Bank of leaked information about Jufeng Park and participate in the robbery, resulting in Jufeng Park was robbed of 343,500 yuan. Plaintiffs believe that the Postal Savings Bank did not do to their client confidentiality and other security obligations,scarpe hogan, should bear the liability.
Defendant: Postal Savings Bank in the savings bank is equipped with a security door, in the business hall is equipped with two security,http://bbs.bjpashanhu.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=32103, and networking with the police installed alarm systems and monitoring equipment. After the incident, the bank has been actively police. These measures proved that the bank has done its own Anbao Yi works. Responsibility for the bank's security can not be unlimited expansion. |
|
發表於 2015-3-24 13:52:42
收藏