|
|
When Urumqi Online (Reporter correspondent Rao Junhua Pan Weina) pilot Lee picking coal off the car from sliding and falling caused his death. Subsequently, Mr. Lee families sued the insurance company to court seeking compensation of third party liability insurance car insurance, but the insurance company believes that Lee is not third-party liability insurance policy in the "third party", he refused to compensate. & Nbsp; & nbsp;
February 15, Tianshan District Court judge introduced, the court found, when the accident occurred,http://sportsfan.jpn.org/cgi-kban/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=101&page=1%3C/a%3E;, Mr. Li belongs to third-party liability insurance policy in the "third party",escarpins louboutin,http://accesio.com/go.cgi, ruling the insurance company paid the amount of insurance third party liability insurance of Lee families 122,000 yuan. Reporters learned that, at present,tiffany milano, the judgment has entered into force. & Nbsp;
Early last year,http://bbs.pipa.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=13935967, when Lee driving his sport utility vehicle on the road, passing near the East Poplar Ditch, he found the road there are a few coal,http://www.jpaic.net, when the car has been passing coal. He then stop,http://asaginet.online.ac, wanted to open coal pick, not a vehicle suddenly want to slide down, he was knocked down and died instantly. & Nbsp;
Later, Lee's family before the incident took the third party liability insurance companies in a compulsory insurance find insurance company paid 122,000 insurance policy required by the claims payment. Insurance companies claimed that Mr. Lee insured vehicle accidents within the contract is not insurance coverage, refused to compensate. & Nbsp; & nbsp;
In desperation, Mr. Lee family will be taken to court the insurance company for the payment of claims payments. & Nbsp; & nbsp;
On the court, the insurance company said, according to pay high insurance requirements, provided that the insurance company to assume payment obligations are traffic accidents, and accidents are not the case; in accordance with the terms of the third party liability insurance in the insurance period, Mr. Lee in the use of the insured vehicle that occur during an accident, resulting in personal injury or property suffered third straight loss, the insurance company according to the insurance contract, should be compensated. & Nbsp;
Insurance companies believe that a third party means a person who suffers personal injury or property damage in a vehicle accident in person, but does not include the car board staff and policyholders, while Lee belongs board staff, not a third party. & Nbsp;
The Court held that, although the incident does not belong to a traffic accident, but the accident, Mr. Lee confirmed that the "third party", the court finally made the decision. & Nbsp; & nbsp;
The trial judge said the case, in this case, it is judged Lee belongs to the "third party" or the insured vehicle, "board staff", it must be issued at the time of the accident with its particular time, whether living insured vehicle on the basis, in the car is "car person" is "under the car officer" in the car,http://www.plxcjc.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=2030607, "third party." Also,hogan outlet, because the motor vehicle is a means of transportation, no one can permanently being in the top of motor vehicles,air jordan soldes, motor vehicle insurance contract involved a "third party" and "staff car" are not permanent, fixed unchanging identity,nike aire max 90,http://pipiham.pos.to/minidiary/apeboard_plus.cgi/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=10/, the two can change with time and space conditions and specific transformation; secondly, Mr. Lee is not lethal in the process of driving a vehicle in the event of an accident, he was in the car, should be under the car people, therefore,http://bbs.anhuinews.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=525983, insurance companies third party liability insurance should be paid to the owners of insurance claims payments. |
|
發表於 2015-7-15 20:50:28
收藏