s reputation was damaged

hjghfg9e7n

 
□ Focus
&#160,http://www.possumov.net;
Peking University: School disrepute will continue the legal rights
(Original title: denounced "North Yingun more" Zou Hengfu lost)
After the verdict, Zou lawyer said the result has been anticipated, will consider the appeal.
 
Peking University is the case do the Qualified Accuser
 
 (Edit: SN182)
The Court held that,air max outlet online italia, in the North v Zouheng Fu defamation case,tiffany outlet, Zou Hengfu use microblogging, defamatory against Peking University and Peking University dean, dean and professor groups, insulting comments, the public have some misunderstanding of Peking University, resulting in Beijing university social evaluation on this matter was significantly reduced, his behavior constituted a violation of the right of reputation.
2. Is Zou's remarks constitute defamation involved
 
Professor Dean, director of this relationship by the total development lewd Zhili in Taoyuan dream big meal to eat and drink with the beautiful waitress bream. As for Dean, director of entertainment outside the ballroom karaoke sauna club to eat and drink whoring even more. Such things are common in Chinese universities. Many foreign visit to China lectures but also the entertainment after dinner to karaoke ballroom sauna foot massage as a necessary program.
Haidian court that Zou Hengfu microblogging has issued 14 means dream Taoyuan waitress and North Dean, Dean, Professor improper relationship behavior, refers to Dream Taoyuan illegal invoices, allegedly through the back door into the North operation, etc., and in The trial did not submit any evidence on the case. Judgment Zou Hengfu microblogging public apology to the two units, remove the infringing microblogging. In addition, compensation dream Taoyuan restaurant claimed 2,200 yuan notary fees and deed binding costs 100 yuan in economic losses.
&#160,air jordan pour femme;
□ judgment
The Court held that the proper evaluation of a university social groups of teachers of ethics conduct also constitutes an important part of the university's good reputation, reputation is directly related to the interests of both. Therefore, the president of Peking University, Dean and Professor Emeritus interest groups against,http://onigdesign.com/error.html, the interests of Peking University also constitutes infringement of reputation.
The Court also held, and does not infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests caused by improper remarks against active derogation is a "prudent person of integrity," published microblogging remarks on general duty of care, Zou Hengfu entirely the duty of care, there is a subjective fault, and the use of Once the Department of Peking University professor identity to speech prone "Insider broke the news," the effect is more likely to mislead the public.
 
Comprehensive Jinghua Times reporter intern Kim Yi Zhang Shuling Xinhua News Agency
 
 
Peking University Department of legal institutions, has filed a civil action in the qualification, and therefore the case of eligibility plaintiff. For the dream Taoyuan company, the court held that a series of statements involve Zou Hengfu the basic elements of a dream Taoyuan company human, financial, material and other statements and evaluation, and complaint reputation infringement case has a direct interest, and therefore the case should be appropriate Georgia plaintiff.
Peking University president when they see a beautiful dream Taoyuan dinner waiter will inevitably start to their adultery. Peking University professor Department is no exception. Therefore, Taoyuan dream business is hot. In addition Zouheng Fu, Beijing Yingun too much.
Appeal: defamation against the request to remove infringing Zou Hengfu microblogging immediately,http://www.longdang.org/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=68071, and a public apology.
August 21, 2012 & nbsp; 21: 22
□ responses
 
 
 
What has happened:
Zouheng Fu lost the first trial to counsel considering an appeal
&#160,http://www.huatai123.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=;
 
 
Yesterday, Zouheng Fu does not appear in the trial,nike air max pas cher, the lawyer said Zou Zou has 20 times to dream Taoyuan restaurant, microblogging comments are personally seen, ears that hear. In addition, it has received more than insider reflecting material, reports Beijing University professor living individual corruption, hair microblogging criticisms are good,http://wx.jazzsynth.com/wxcgi/kizai/sunkizai.cgi?mode=form&no=83&page="il, not satisfy the curiosity of the public disclosure of such material. Zou Hengfu that their criticism of Beijing University professor individual in question, if reputation infringement, but also by individual professors sued not Peking eligibility plaintiff is not entitled to sue.
 
 
Yesterday, the sensational Zouheng Fu denounced "North Yingun too much," the issue, temporarily drawing to an end. Yesterday, the Haidian court for the North and the dream of Taoyuan restaurant infringement complaint Zouheng Fu made the verdict, judgment Zou Hengfu microblogging home to the North and the dream of Taoyuan restaurant apologized for 7 consecutive days. Zou did not personally appear in the trial, his lawyer said it would consider an appeal. & Nbsp;
&#160,boutique louboutin paris;
 
 
&#160,http://www.aihoku.net/cgi-local/aska/aska.cgi/%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B;
Yesterday, Peking University,http://www.menqiu.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, responsible person responded that according to the law the public hearing of the Court of Haidian North v Zouheng Fu defamation case, to help the people's court case objectively and comprehensively identify and properly handle the case and the public know the truth, right and wrong . Through the trial of the case and the judgment, the Court of the North an innocent and alert the public, especially public figures to comply with the minimum of ethics and law, to take responsibility for their words and deeds.
 
North hope Zouheng Fu obligation to fulfill the court as soon as possible, for the damage to the reputation of Peking serious conduct a formal apology, and perform other related matters involving judgment. The legal action is intended to clarify the truth,http://www.bcm.co.jp, to discern right from wrong, Zou Hengfu microblogging eliminate adverse effects caused by the inaccurate statements. North said they would cherish their own eyes cherish the school's reputation as, when the school's reputation was damaged, the North will continue to pick up the legal weapons to protect the image and reputation.
At 09:00 on August 21 2012
Peking University, Taoyuan dream restaurant in September 2012 sued