The two banks considered itself does not have any fault. Both banks believe

alksf00ug

Very hard to detect, the public event,http://www.suiningmz.com/edu/Review.asp?NewsID=507,louboutin soldes,http://salon.e-kuchikomi.info, "Guess who" calls -
 
Yangcheng Evening News reporter Xie Ying, Huang Caihua correspondent reports: Dongguan public Mr. Kong received the "Guess Who" after the telephone, has in Mandarin, Cantonese, Enping, then test each other, the result can answer, make sure the other party is "classmate "After the transfer lend each 6,000 yuan.
 
Mr. Kong later found deceived, ordered the transfer process the payer bank, the payee bank both to court, claims more than 30,000 yuan. Court of First Instance finds that the two banks did not constitute infringement, dismissed Mr. Kong.
 
Mr. Kong appealed. Recently, the Dongguan Intermediate People's Court of Final Appeal upheld the conviction.
 
Three languages tentative OK "Classmates"
 
June 6, 2012 12 am,wholesale razilian hair weave, Mr. Kong went to a bank to transact business in Dongguan City, South City. Just then, he got a phone call. Mr. Kong recalled that the telephone man so that he "Guess who I am." Mr. Kong has in Mandarin, Cantonese and Enping words temptation, the other can respond,http://bbs.rencunol.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4248508, Mr. Kong to believe that the other is a classmate of his.
 
Chat, the "students" is the day that Mr. Kong from Dongguan City Changan things go South, he said he was just going to Chang'an town, and that need the money to get out want to borrow money. Mr. Kong agreed. "Students," also said he was with a friend in a bank Chang'an work, so Mr. Kong will be transferred to 6000 yuan under the name of his friend, and provides a user name to Wang's bank account. Mr. Kong will be directly in the South bank transfer to each other, and then, "students" to confirm the money has been received on the phone.
 
Mr. Kong in the South after finishing things back to Chang'an, called to invite the "students" to eat,http://www.rapz.de, the other party has said it had gone Huang Town. Under Mr. Kong puzzled to find a classmate's phone number in the phone, behind the call know cheated, then immediately reported. Subsequently, Mr. Kong Wang found the payee bank is a bank branch in Foshan, Dongguan Changan Branch is not.
 
Mr. Kong believes that the receiving bank Chang'an Branch unverified complete the transfer process, but there is no instruction remittance bank branch in Dongguan Bank payee check customer information submitted is consistent with actual, shall be liable for damages.
 
Claims are losing 30,000 yuan two trial
 
In October, Mr. Kong sued the two banks to the court, that the other side constitute property infringement, asked the two banks returned to 6000 yuan and 500 yuan of interest, related costs 20,000 yuan compensation for mental damages,http://twitter-app.seesaa.net, lost income 10,000 yuan, and together written apology.
 
The two banks considered itself does not have any fault. Both banks believe, Mr. Kong said the encounter telephone fraud,http://www.erikatokyo.jp,nike tn pas cher, while the other will be in Mandarin,brazilian hair weave, Cantonese and Enping, then a big gap between the three accent, Mr. Kong also knowing that very few people speak at the same time. Banks have reason to believe, Mr. Kong is not actually deceived, but remitted to the students.
 
Mr. Kong purpose is to transfer money transfers to Wang,http://www.mfuarchive.net, but Wang accounts which have been imported.
 
Court after hearing that the two banks operate no violation of relevant provisions of the Chinese People's Bank's business, and there is no evidence to suggest that Mr. Kong public security departments have been cheated of their filing or other fact-finding or concluding observations, so Mr. Kong to Wang Transfer is normal behavior or deceived, it can not be determined. Therefore, even if the loss of 6,hogan outlet,000 yuan Mr. Kong, and between the two banks operate according to the provisions of flow behavior nor causation.
 
Last December,http://tuonela.s138.xrea.com/lightbbs/light.cgi?res=8431, the Court of First Instance judgment, finds the two banks to Mr. Kong did not constitute infringement, dismissed their claims. Mr. Kong refused to accept the appeal. Recently, the Dongguan Intermediate People's Court made the final judgment, rejected the appeal and upheld the conviction.
 
(Original title: three languages, verification is "students" Dongguan public "borrow" money losses 6000 yuan)