汽車旅館論壇

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 561|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

the other two defendants Lumou

[複製鏈接]

54

主題

54

帖子

260

積分

中級會員

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
260
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2015-12-5 01:15:05 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |正序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
& Nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; newspaper correspondent Cang Xuan Miao Lina told reporters in Wenzhou
 
Last June 23, Wenzhou, 14-year-old Brit donkey, and his mother and other adults 7 Chu River through the Grand Canyon together. Brits with his mother during the dispersion, and a male friend counterparts mother,it will not be disclosed, then missing.
 
Subsequently, the local search and rescue thousands of people participated. Finally, in the 126 days after missing Brits, his remains were found in the cracks in the stone.
 
In March this year, the Brits father submitted by counsel to the Cangnan court pleadings, to the last to leave the small warm Xu, leader Wu, accompanied by six ALICE lawsuit that accused children 6 bears security obligations, temporary guardianship obligation to actively search and rescue duty, but are not doing, bear civil liability to deal with the death of Brits. Brits father to six claimants 115.9865 million.
 
This includes 1,150,16 pairs of new floats ride t,000 757,020 yuan compensation for death, funeral expenses 20,045 yuan, 120,000 yuan in emotional and transportation delay costs 262,Veste barbour,800 yuan.
 
Six defendants have moved to dismiss the plaintiff's claim.
 
(Newspaper last June from the 26th to the events of the tracking report)
 
Yesterday morning, the case in Cangnan Court.
 
The trial began at 9:10 or so. Six defendants, the final temperature together with small promoters Wu Xu and their hired a defense lawyer,moncler pas cher, the other person is his defense.
 
Trial, Brits mother always head down, occasionally hand on his forehead. When you hear the name of his son, tears streaming down.
 
The focus of a court debate:
 
 
 
Six defendants Have temporary guardianship
 
The plaintiff's agent, Zhejiang Kyushu public lawyer Wen made positive take:
 
Guardian is the first case of small temperature Brits mother, but the mother after halfway Brits Brits will be entrusted to Xu four defendants, the defendants did not raise objections, entrust guardianship relationship formally established. After that, a small gentle mother can not meet, therefore obliged to fulfill the temporary guardian is guardian Brits personal health and safety safeguards obligations generated. Temporary guardian should assume the obligation to protect the personal safety of the ward.
 
But one of the defendants, defense lawyers asked the organizers Wu:
 
Security obligation was established for the business or professional outdoor activities, and this is the AA system through the activities of outdoor activities at your own risk. Brit's mother as guardian was also present, so other adults do not have security obligations.
 
But plaintiffs' lawyers said, "at your own risk" concept does not apply in this case. For "own risk" concept of "risk" generally refers to the risk caused by natural forces, including meteorological, geological disasters, flash floods and other virulence. And in this case the consequences are not responsible for the organization due to human caused tragedies caused by human factors.
 
Focus II:
 
 
 
6 defendants have endless obligation to save each other
 
Plaintiff lawyers: 6 accused failed to fulfill obligations among team members help each other. Especially Xu, as a last resort and Brits together people, actually throwing Brits at 5:00 left alone. And when was the police, the defendants did not return in time to rescue the first Brits, but the night ride back to Wenzhou, apparently did not try to mutual aid obligations.
 
In this regard, 6 defendants argued in court, it is because you want to take care of the Brits, they forward speed is limited, and lead to lost and dispersed. Moreover, after getting lost, they have been looking for help Brits, so we are doing to the obligation of mutual aid.
 
And Brits finally separated Xu's lawyer said that Xu was not left little warm, but to seek rescue. And, after seeing the rescue workers, rescue workers told Xu first time with the deceased separate locations. Not the first time to go back to the search and rescue, but also listen to the arrangements of public security and search and rescue personnel.
 
Focus 3:
 
 
 
Brits mother and 6 defendants, who is more responsibility
 
The plaintiff said that before participating in the activities,and some dark days, Brits mother prior consent of the originator Xu Wu also recognized several ALICE meeting after another has not objected,louboutin femme, so the Brits death, six defendants should be liable.
 
But 6 defendant, Brits accident, his mother has primary responsibility. Initially, before the commencement of the event through the peer ALICE Brits had expressed opposition to participate on the spot, but his mother insisted belt Brits Brits -
 
Defendant Lee said,peuterey spaccio, before crossing, he said to the little warm mother, canyon difficult to walk,unlawful advertising, children can not go. Brits her mother that she had kids walked Ryan XX canyon, her child is very powerful so on. Lee said he was also said that Ryan XX canyon better go, this canyon is difficult to walk,[/url], a child is not fit to go. But Brits mother said she did not question the child.
 
About this conversation, the other two defendants Lumou,[url=http://fsboteaneck.com]Dongmaoling police station ph
, Xu X sign to demonstrate heard.
 
Lee said, because of the small temperature children to mother insisted, so she is more responsible for this tragedy. The defendant in this case should be a real little warm mother.
 
Plaintiffs' lawyers argued that if the court finds that Brits mother needs to take responsibility, may be divided into directly and deduct the amount of compensation.
 
Focus Four:
 
 
 
Assume responsibility 6 defendant, who is relatively large responsibility
 
Plaintiff lawyers, 6 peers ALICE assume liability case has size:
 
First, and Brits mother with walk overland Lumou, Kang,scarpe hogan outlet, relative to the same temperature accompanied by four small donkey, the liability is relatively small. Secondly, responsibilities and four fellow Brits Mix in the remaining two (Lee, Xu X) need to bear with respect to the promoters and final Wu Xu,the principal told them the s, together with the Brits also smaller. Finally, together with the former Brits missing Wu Xu and sponsors are required to bear the primary responsibility.
 
In this regard, there are also differences between the six defendants.
 
Several other than the defendant Xu also suggested that Xu leaving Brits in the valley asking for a way out,Reporters on the scene, should bear corresponding civil liability.
 
But Xu believes that he is not at fault, the organizers Wu failed to fulfill its security obligations organizers and peers who should assume greater responsibility.
 
After the trial, the plaintiff does not agree to mediation, insist resolved through litigation. The court will choose sentencing.
 
(Original title: Brits claim for one million parents sued 6 ALICE heated debate yesterday's hearing of the four focus)
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 汽車旅館網  

GMT+8, 2024-10-3 19:17 , Processed in 0.067809 second(s), 24 queries .

Powered by 104mm! BBS X3.2

© 1999-2015 104mm.com

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表