RDu01063Xb

bg7uS4zA9s

○ Plaintiff: the bathroom there are significant security risks, claims 140,000; Defendant: fall of responsibility should be borne by the plaintiff himself & nbsp;
 
○ Changsha Intermediate People's Court after the trial court for sentencing yesterday, the two sides expressed obey the verdict, there is no appeal for the spot
 
American people  at Changsha Pinghetang sixth floor of a restaurant meal,http://www.xn--dkwo7bow01a.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=137427, accidentally fell in the toilet, causing multiple fractures. Houla Li thing to Pinghetang bathroom there are significant security risks, citing its court, claims 140,000 yuan. Yesterday, the Changsha Intermediate People's Court of First Instance on the case and the court verdict, Larry Pinghetang compensation 25,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=,000 yuan.
 
All welcomed the reporter correspondent Wang Lifu Hu Wei, Changsha reported cream
 
Plaintiff: broke into eight disabled in the bathroom
 
Larry said the evening of 8 March 2009, he and a friend in a restaurant Pinghetang. During his time convenient to the toilet and, behold, the cleaning staff to clean toilets defendant health, water damage because the ground was dry, and did not get any tips accused and the cleaning staff, leading to withdraw when he fell from the stool compartment. After identification, Larry injuries constitute 8 disabled. Larry think as a consumer, in an interview with the accused service personal rights have been violated, cause a lot of inconvenience, they put each other to court,http://bbs.nd900.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=676004&extra=, claims for the loss of more than 140,000 yuan.
 
No consumer contractual relationship between the parties: the defendant
 
However, the defendant Pinghetang company said: it's not personal injury plaintiff perpetrators,http://www.qewe.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=210881, not the tortfeasor,air max pas cher, no consumer contract between plaintiff and defendant.
 
Meanwhile, toilet defendant free to the public,http://www.dademall.com/discuz/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4665016, is a professional cleaning company commissioned by star hotel standard management, in full compliance with "People's Republic of China Consumer Protection Law," the provisions and requirements. In addition, the plaintiffs are adults with full civil capacity, falls the responsibility should be borne by themselves.
 
Court: the plaintiff's own fault is the main reason
 
10:00 yesterday, the Changsha Intermediate People's Court judge came to the Wuyi Square Pinghetang the sixth floor to the scene to verify the evidence.
 
"Where are you then?" The judge asked the time of the incident in this clean sweep of health workers. "I'll clean up here." & Nbsp; cleaning staff that come in after the other, he did not go out. Scene by a judge to restore things as follows: At the time, there are women in the men's room to clean,http://www.asyhj.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=948960, so Larry entered the compartment urine, the bathroom floor was slippery, without any prompting around, plus stool compartment space is too small to turn around urine after Larry back out of the compartment with the result at the step Caikong foot, causing accidents.
 
Pinghetang aspect attorney rejected the mediation of the court of justice, then judge lawfully issued subpoena. Yesterday afternoon, the case for trial and sentencing court. The court held that the plaintiff requested the defendant to bear some responsibility, having factual and legal basis for the Court to support it.
 
However, as adults with full civil capacity,air jordan pas cher, the plaintiff in the toilet fell,nike tn pas cher, mainly because they no toilet facilities and security risks given sufficient attention, is the main fault of their own,air jordan pas cher, to deal with their own negative 60% damage responsibility. Finally, the Court of First Instance ruled that the defendant Larry compensate 25,http://bbs.sxqzxmw.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=74583,louboutin femme pas cher,http://bbs.onebike.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=234923,000 yuan. The two sides expressed obey the verdict, did not spot an appeal request.