NR67p88p24

nerty661j

Reporter Yan Jing
 
Yesterday morning, a district court in Hangzhou together libel verdicts. Involving personal privacy, the court hearing the case is not open.
 
Ms. A plaintiff, defendant Ms. B, are over 30 years old, two colleagues, both married, we had a very good relationship between the two.
 
"Her husband told my husband brother, have business contacts, and often ...... I and her colleagues, a good relationship ......" A lady said.
 
2008, A woman's husband, an accident and died.
 
"B and her husband came to see me a few times ...... Later Her husband often called me and asked me every day situation."
 
Ms. A said,http://www.8264.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, perhaps because of this, let Ms. B thought the two had an affair, and then B on the unit, in front of friends and blog, with no way to attack her was named third party.
 
December 25, 2009, A Ms. defamation to Ms. B court.
 
Ms. A complains: Ms. B have published an article on the blog, describing "a few years ago to act as a third party, with a number of men having an affair, entanglement is unclear, her husband misappropriated property",http://www.aurosiksha.org/login/index.php?item/create_form/1, and the blog address to the friend,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, also released News Online in the unit. These Bowen widely circulated in the unit, causing adverse effects on the community, a great impact on his reputation, and lead to heart because he was suffering from mental disorders,louboutin soldes, many times to hospital for treatment.
 
Ms. A Ms. B provides a portion Bowen wrote:
 
"In just two months after her husband died, just as someone else's husband and frequent contact with close ties to incredible proportions ......"
 
"A four-year-old woman ...... how even the most basic morality are not ??"
 
In Part blog, Ms B also posted a text message containing photos A phone number is (withheld digits) is.
 
Ms. B argued that: blog is a personal feeling experience, said things are the source (she provides some witness testimony to prove that he did not deliberately fabricated, fictitious facts); other Bowen also unspecified objects,http://acneshoponline.com, not for a specific person; the unit made news online blog address is workers' rights,louboutin pas cher femme, not intentionally spread, and the unit News Network can not connect to external networks, blog traffic is not, no adverse social impact; some blog posts and people do not mean to say Ms. A; In addition,tiffany outlet, the spirit of A lady is no exception.
 
The Court held that, although the blog does not name names, but some personal family situation, Ms. A Bowen revealed, showing the phone number,http://demo.web300.cn/free8/Review.asp?NewsID=627, resulting in the familiar A lady described the situation of people think that A lady. In addition, there is no evidence that Ms. B A is a third party.
 
Yesterday, the Court of First Instance ruled that the defendant was established libel, because the defendant has a corresponding blog post now deleted, as appropriate sentences, the plaintiff claims for moral damages has no legal basis, not support it.
 
The first trial, Ms. B was sentenced to regulatory penalties, and compensate the plaintiff for medical expenses.
 
Last night, the reporter contacted the two women.
 
Phone, B Ms. emotional resolute attitude, expressed no recognition of this verdict, we must appeal.
 
"I was the victim, she and I are very good friends, after her husband died, my husband and I helped her deal with the aftermath, and found her husband and I are very frequent close contact ......
 
"I have repeatedly reminded her attention heterosexual intercourse scale, what things are and I say, do not just tell my husband, but she did not listen,air jordan homme pas cher, but also the use of covert methods to contact my husband ......
 
"Last February, I had filed for divorce, when my child was only one year old, Reporters comrades, you say if it is not to be hurt too,http://www.burnish-club.com, why should I get a divorce? I just put their real experiences and feelings recorded in a blog down,http://www.88yanzi.com/thread-2586314-1-1.html, I was very sad, angry and said some offensive remarks, but I have absolutely no name names, but also pay attention to protect her, her phone number I have hidden away a few numbers ...... "
 
The A lady said that she and Ms. B's husband "very clean." Since her husband's business contacts, Ms. B's husband ten years ago know her husband has told her brother called her sister, married after they both ordinary exchanges are very frequent. Her husband died unexpectedly, as very good friends,air max milano, some talk and comfort is normal.
 
Ms,http://gookuma.seesaa.net. A in the QQ said to me:
 
"During that time she and her husband relationship is not good, but later found a few more we talk, we wonder if we have an affair, and then began to spread everywhere. In fact, to this day I do not understand why she, she is with her husband call list identified, there is no other evidence. Of course, we are indeed very innocent! "
 
Especially in the case wrote that the court verdict -
 
Published a blog post to describe their feelings and publish your blog site is a right, but not having a privacy blog log, Internet diary, the author is not specific audience than can be read, once published, can be widely disseminated, and therefore published blog post should assume the obligation not to abuse the rights of others.