t0z6VgfxAQ

fr85y7r5n5

WASHINGTON (special correspondent Yue Jiang Gu Jianguo reporters in) order for the company to seek a competitive advantage in public procurement,http://gamsa.net/guestbook/index.php?item/create_form/1,louboutin pas cher,http://www.8264.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, to get more projects, Chen Kang, general manager of a sports field engineering company actually agreed to subordinate to the relevant units responsible for bribery. Last year, the company for commercial bribery is punishable by Industrial and Commercial Bureau administrative penalties of $ 150,000, the company that this fine should bear the . Recently, the Huangpu District court Chen Kang compensation company 150,000 yuan.
 
Companies bribery fetch items
 
December 2004, Chen Kang was appointed general manager of a sports ground engineering company, contracting the company's business operations,air max outlet online italia, and expenses in the company's business scope has the final right to review. Shortly after taking office, the company sales manager Daimou find Chen Kang, proposed by the company can not come up with a fee thank the person in charge of the unit, so that the company dock operations.
 
Chen Kang agreed Daimou the proposal and organized by Daimou responsible. Before each bribery, Daimou engineering team are the first to find the name of the project cost of materials invoice, after examined and signed Chen Kang,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, a check drawn to the company's financial department, followed by their own private companies to come up with the cash by check for bribery .
 
During 2005-2009, Daimou has repeatedly given a total of 220,000 yuan in charge of relevant business co-operation, the company has received contracts amounting to 688 million yuan of stadium construction project from the unit.
 
2009 became public, the prosecution of bribery Daimou prosecution, court decision Daimou be guilty of bribery, exempted from criminal punishment. After the incident, Trade and Industry Bureau of the company's violation of the "Anti-Unfair Competition Law,http://bliss.gjpw.net," has constituted the use of property for commercial bribery way to undertake the project, then made the decision to order the company to correct and impose a fine of 150,000 yuan.
 
General manager of the accused in court
 
The company believes,http://dtqnjy.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1171943, fined 150,http://zc676.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=69052,000 yuan Chen Kang was entirely due to violation of the law in carrying out their duties caused by compensation should the company's direct economic losses. Thus, the company will Chen Kang court seeks to recover $ 150,air max outlet italia,000.
 
Chen Kang argued that the loss of 15 million company with himself as no causal link between the general manager, he has been considered for operational activities 220,000 yuan is normal,http://tt.ipinse.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=162556, and he is also to be approval in the normal amount. In addition, during the general manager himself as the company has been profitable, there is no actual loss.
 
The trial, Chen Kang presented to the court a criminal judgment and an audit report to prove individual behavior of employees constitute a criminal offense, they did not be held criminally responsible and the company has annual profit in 2005-2009.
 
The court sentenced its own money
 
After the court pointed out that Chen Kang understands and agrees to withdraw money from the sales manager thanked the people responsible for their wrongdoing can be identified at the time of carrying out their duties from the company. In this case, the company is a management responsibility to implement the responsibility system for companies, the contractor shall perform due diligence obligations, ensure business law. Chen Kang served as general manager of the company as a contractor in the period, in the case of fault of the company because of its commercial bribery subject to administrative punishment,tiffany outlet italia, the loss should its compensation.
 
The Court also held, general manager of the company turned a profit of its obligations under "management task responsibility" agreement, not because of the fault cause the Company's general manager was fined derogate, therefore,http://moodle.ndna.org.uk/login/index.php?item/create_form/1,air max outlet online italia, the court decides not to defend Chen Kang stand by. (Text suspects were pseudonym)
 
Welcome to comment I want to comment
 Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging