R77FtkSROe

hh5sr1eRq

Morning News (Reporter Wu new) Lee without the consent of two tenants, while they are not, they were forced to enter the leased houses,http://kuaidog.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=83608, the house of their laptops, TVs, refrigerators and other items illegally detained, in order to blackmail the tenant to pay the rent. Yesterday, reporters learned that the Beijing Intermediate Court of Final Appeal sentenced Lee to one year imprisonment.
 
According to the prosecution alleged,http://jsxwbxg.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2818, in June 2009, the defendant Lee Chan fails to pay the rent by the time the contract without the consent of Ms. Chen, while it is not in the machine, forced their way into their lease Huilongguan,hogan outlet sito ufficiale, Changping District, a residential housing inside,louboutin soldes,http://blog.ky4z.cn/?uid-49598-action-viewspace-itemid-156, it was illegally detained inside the laptop, as a blackmail to ask for 800 yuan. Chan Lee also refused to refund the deposit and one month's rent totaling 1,http://www.look2345.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=33137,800 yuan. Last November,http://www.qisidi.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=43871, Lee the same reason, forced into Mr. Zhang tenant houses, the other house of TV, refrigerators,http://www.shop-colour.net, computers, DVD players and other items illegally detained, and refused to refund the deposit of 800 yuan.
 
During the trial, the defendant Lee pleaded not guilty. Lee said he is owner of the house,http://www.taoputu.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3256513, it is lawful to recover the house. However,hogan outlet, the two houses of homeowners involved confirmed that they will each house rented to Lee, Lee relevant rental contract can not be privately sublet. However,piumini woolrich outlet, Lee still will sublet the house, from personal gain.
 
Lee guilty of first instance court of illegal housebreaking,http://www.54qingdao.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, sentenced to one year. Lee appealed against the verdict. Lee's counsel that the fact that Ms. Chen Lee invade residential unclear insufficient evidence, was due to the rental of civil disputes arising between Lee and Mr. Chang, its conduct did not constitute a crime. Ultimately,roshe run pas cher, the City Court did not adopt the views of Lee and his defenders, the hospital dismissed Lee final appeal and upheld the original verdict.
 
 Share: welcome to comment I want to comment
 Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN009)